diff --git a/Sections/4-Tentations.tex b/Sections/4-Tentations.tex
index e31593ac05d9ba8d876abd2823facef4e4a273d9..b875d2e41806c7b289ab95ad3e8780f67cbffe91 100644
--- a/Sections/4-Tentations.tex
+++ b/Sections/4-Tentations.tex
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
% -----------------------Introduction
+
\subsection{A real use case}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Let's write a paper with a bing.com}
\begin{block}{Major possible contributions}
\begin{itemize}
- \item<1,7> Chose a general research subject (novelty, literature)
+ \item<1,7> Choose a general research subject (novelty, literature)
\item<2,7> Have a good idea (or many of them)
\item<3,7> Implement your idea (experiment, code, etc) and get results
\item<4,7> Analyze the results and determine if there is something new here
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
- \frametitle{Chose a research topic}
+ \frametitle{Choose a research topic}
\begin{block}{Question: "Give me 4 hot topics for LBM research"}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1> Turbulence modeling
@@ -52,18 +53,18 @@
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Help with novel ideas and novel methods}
- \begin{block}{Question: Can you give me an idea on how to solve quantum fluid flow?}
+ \begin{block}{Question: Can you give me an idea on how to solve quantum fluid flows?}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1> "Sorry no."
\item<2> Only based on already performed work
- \item<2> Can only "create" something new by combining words...
- \item<3> But gives only very generic and vague advice when pushed
- \item<4> Ideas \textbf{are proposed with references} but are usually not even related to the field.
- \item<5> Cannot propose actual design of complex experiments
- \item<6> Writes \textbf{simple} codes, but mostly for simple and trivial tasks.
+ \item<3> Can only "create" something new by combining words...
+ \item<4> But gives only very generic and vague advice when pushed
+ \item<5> Ideas \textbf{are proposed with references} but are usually not even related to the field.
+ \item<6> Cannot propose actual design of complex experiments
+ \item<7> Writes \textbf{simple} codes, but mostly for simple and trivial tasks.
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
- \only<7>{
+ \only<8>{
\begin{block}{Potential problem?}
\begin{itemize}
\item Security and privacy of the prompts?
@@ -73,6 +74,28 @@
}
\end{frame}
+\begin{frame}[fragile]
+ \frametitle{Summarize old ideas for reuse}
+ \begin{block}{Problems}
+ \begin{itemize}
+ \item<1> We tend to believe generative models because they write nice sentences
+ \item<2> But generative models are not always right
+ \item<3> Generative models cannot give any source for the information it provides
+ \item<4> Therefore we must \textbf{ALWAYS} check whether the answers are correct
+ \item<5> Prerequisite: we must be experts already to be able to check or correctness or live with the risk of major errors
+ \end{itemize}
+ \end{block}
+ \only<2>{
+ \begin{block}{Yes but Wikipedia is the same!}
+ \begin{itemize}
+ \item<1> Well... Sorry but no
+ \item<2> Wikipedia has thousands of reviewers
+ \item<3> References can be found for most information on the Wikipedia pages
+ \end{itemize}
+ \end{block}
+ }
+\end{frame}
+
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Data analysis}
\begin{block}{Maybe an interest?}
@@ -157,10 +180,10 @@ plt.show()
\end{frame}
-\subsection{Introduction}
+\subsection{Introduction / Conclusion}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
-\frametitle{Introduction: Summary and highlights}
- \begin{block}{Very hard}
+\frametitle{Introduction / Conclusion: Summary and highlights}
+ \begin{block}{Very hard: Derived from methods and results parts}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1> Most prompts allow for texts that are 2000 characters long
\item<2> Difficult to summarize the complete paper with prompts this short
@@ -174,7 +197,7 @@ plt.show()
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
-\frametitle{Write a bibliography on quantum fluid flow with LBM}
+\frametitle{Write a bibliography on quantum fluid flows with LBM}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/biblio.png}
\begin{block}{Looks cool right?}
\begin{itemize}
@@ -186,30 +209,67 @@ plt.show()
\end{block}
\end{frame}
+\begin{frame}[fragile]
+\frametitle{Practical concerns}
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item<1> Reading (and have a deep understanding) of papers is integral part of our job (AI cannot read or us)
+ \item<1> Summarizing and highlighting is of major importance (convey meaning to others)
+ \item<1> Homogeneous style helps others understanding
+ \item<2> Except if papers are only read and written by other AIs
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+\subsection{Abstract}
+\begin{frame}[fragile]
+\frametitle{Write an abstract}
+ \begin{block}{Finally a good use?}
+ \begin{itemize}
+ \item<1> Given the title of the paper
+ \item<1> And bullet points with the major contributions
+ \item<2> Good results can be achieved! Hooray!
+ \end{itemize}
+ \end{block}
+\end{frame}
\frametitle{For some more fun}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Translations}
\frametitle{From french to english}
- La méthode de boltzmann sur réseau est une méthode novatrice de simulation de mécanique des fluides computationnelle qui existe depuis une vingtaine d'années.
+ La m\'ethode de boltzmann sur r\'eseau est une m\'ethode novatrice de simulation de m\'ecanique des fluides computationnelle qui existe depuis une vingtaine d'ann\'ees.
\vskip0.5truecm
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{Figures/translation.png}
\only<2>{
- \vskip0.25truecm
+ \vskip0.1truecm
\textbf{I always knew french was language that allowed to express ideas in a very condensed manner!}
}
\end{frame}
+\begin{frame}[fragile]
+ \frametitle{For points (1,1), (2,2), ..., (10, 10) draw a scatter plot}
+ \only<1>{
+ How it started\\
+ \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/numbers.png}
+ }
+ \only<2>{
+ How it continued\\
+ \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/python.png}
+ }
+ \only<3>{
+ How it ended\\
+ \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/points.png}
+ }
+\end{frame}
+
\subsection{Closing remarks}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{When to use a generative AI}
\begin{block}{My two cents as an old person}
\begin{itemize}
- \item Any boring task that can be checked in \textbf{seconds} or that has zero impact
+ \item Any boring task that can be checked within \textbf{seconds} or that has zero impact
\item Write the cover letter (or rebuttals)
\item Shorten small paragraphs
- \item Rephrase sentences
+ \item Rephrase sentences and keeping the same meaning
+ \item Write very short code snippets
\item \textbf{Please: never for doing mathematical tasks...}
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
@@ -217,49 +277,30 @@ plt.show()
\begin{frame}[fragile]
-\frametitle{Well this is more philosophical}
+\frametitle{A bit more meta-physical questions}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea?}
\begin{itemize}
- \item Plagiarism? Just cite the generative AI used as the source with date, but output is inherently non-reproducible!
- \item Ethics? Generative AIs are "an average" of other people's work (impossible to find the original source)
+ \item Plagiarism? Just cite the generative AI used as the source with date, but output is inherently non-reproducible!\\
+ We should also provide the exact sequence of prompts used and it would not be enough!
+ \item Ethics? Generative AIs are "an average" of other people's work (impossible to find the original source)\\
+ What if you copy-pasted an exact sentence from another author without knowing it?
\item Intellectual property? Who is the "owner" of the content produced?
- \item Skills evolution? To use AI one must be expert in its field, by using AI one becomes less an expert.
+ \item Skills evolution? To use AI one must be expert in its field, by using AI one becomes less an expert\\
+ Each time you use an AI you make \textbf{zero} effort (no rephrasing, no creativity, etc)
+ \item Energy concerns? Each AI powered request consumes 10-20x a google search (70-140g of CO2)
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
+\subsection{Disclaimer}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
-\frametitle{Believing chatGPT on what it says}
- Multiple examples on times it doesn't work
+ \begin{block}{Possible critics to this presentation}
\begin{itemize}
- \item Rabbit's eggs
- \item Definition of a lozenge
- \item Students using it for a base code
+ \item But $<$Insert other model here$>$ gives better results
+ \item You are biased against generative AIs
+ \item AIs are just algorithms, we can trust them
+ \item
\end{itemize}
- \vspace{20pt}
-
- Not just an hallucination!
- \begin{itemize}
- \item As seen before, this is the expected behaviour
- \item chatGPT generates convincing texts
- \item Generates what an average person would write about it
- \end{itemize}
-
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}[fragile]
- \frametitle{For a given set of points draw the scatter plot}
- \only<1>{
- How it started\\
- \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/numbers.png}
- }
- \only<2>{
- How it continued\\
- \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/python.png}
- }
- \only<3>{
- How it ended\\
- \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{Figures/points.png}
- }
+ \end{block}
\end{frame}