\item<6,7> Submit and answer to the reviewers' comments
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{Here we will write a papier with the AI of Copilot because that's what we have access at Hepia. There are 6 places where it could be helpful to use an AI when writing a paper and we want to see how good/bad it could be in each section. Choose a topic is really about a hot topic of research. Give ideas is about ideas on your research topic and how to progress towards novel methods. Implement ideas is from idea to actual code or experiments. Analyze the results is again about how to interpret results, and/or write code to do it. Last two are quite self explanatory.}
\end{frame}
\note{Here we will write a papier with the AI of Copilot because that's what we have access at Hepia. There are 6 places where it could be helpful to use an AI when writing a paper and we want to see how good/bad it could be in each section. Choose a topic is really about a hot topic of research. Give ideas is about ideas on your research topic and how to progress towards novel methods. Implement ideas is from idea to actual code or experiments. Analyze the results is again about how to interpret results, and/or write code to do it. Last two are quite self explanatory.}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Where would it be useful to use an AI actually?}
...
...
@@ -30,17 +30,17 @@
\item<1> Submit and answer to the reviewers' comments
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{The most promising are:
\begin{itemize}
\item Implement ideas, wrtie the paper, and answer to reviewers/cover letter
\item Analyze results (for intermediary steps maybe and code), chose a reserach topic (hype related)
\item Give ideas (idea generation is somthing it cannot learn if not already existing)
\end{itemize}
}
\end{frame}
\note{The most promising are:
\begin{itemize}
\item Implement ideas, wrtie the paper, and answer to reviewers/cover letter
\item Analyze results (for intermediary steps maybe and code), chose a reserach topic (hype related)
\item Give ideas (idea generation is somthing it cannot learn if not already existing)
\end{itemize}
}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Choose a research topic}
\only<1-> {
...
...
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
\item<1,3> Multi-phase flows
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{I asked the question "Give me a good research topic". Quite disappointing. Not really hype topics for 3 of them, and one simply absurd but just a combination of buzz words.}
}
\only<3>{
\begin{block}{The problem?}
...
...
@@ -64,7 +65,6 @@
}
\end{frame}
\note{I asked the question "Give me a good research topic". Quite disappointing. Not really hype topics for 3 of them, and one simply absurd but just a combination of buzz words.}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Help with novel ideas and novel methods}
...
...
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
\item<7> Writes \textbf{simple} codes, but mostly for simple and trivial tasks.
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{
Then I tried to get ideas with nodel ideas and method. I got these answers after insisting a bit. When references exist they can be WRONG (not existing or existing but on the wrong topic.)
}
\only<8>{
\begin{block}{Potential problems?}
\begin{itemize}
...
...
@@ -89,9 +92,6 @@
}
\end{frame}
\note{
Then I tried to get ideas with nodel ideas and method. I got these answers after insisting a bit. When references exist they can be WRONG (not existing or existing but on the wrong topic.)
}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Summarize old ideas for reuse}
...
...
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@
\item<5> Prerequisite: must be experts already to check correctness or live with risk of major errors
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{
We could use AI for summarizing but there a re a few caveats. They often make mistakes, forget parts, etc. It is mandatory to check every part very cautiously otherwise there may be mistakes. It is even harder because everything is well written!
}
\only<6>{
\begin{block}{The famous ``Yes but Wikipedia is the same!'' quote}
\begin{itemize}
...
...
@@ -115,9 +118,6 @@
}
\end{frame}
\note{
We could use AI for summarizing but there a re a few caveats. They often make mistakes, forget parts, etc. It is mandatory to check every part very cautiously otherwise there may be mistakes. It is even harder because everything is well written!
}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Data analysis}
...
...
@@ -129,6 +129,9 @@
\item<4> Easy to iterate quickly and see if the results make sense
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{
For data analysis it seems usable because it's mainly write a simple script that is not critical (from the accuracy and security point of view). It can therefore be quickly checked. Nevertheless for quick prototyping it is easy to see if the result make sense. The code is usually shoirt and there are a lot of examples all over the internet to learn from.
}
\only<4>{
\begin{block}{Potential problems?}
\begin{itemize}
...
...
@@ -141,9 +144,6 @@
}
\end{frame}
\note{
For data analysis it seems usable because it's mainly write a simple script that is not critical (from the accuracy and security point of view). It can therefore be quickly checked. Nevertheless for quick prototyping it is easy to see if the result make sense. The code is usually shoirt and there are a lot of examples all over the internet to learn from.
}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Plot the data contained in a CSV file}
...
...
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ plt.ylabel('First Column')
plt.title('Plot of First Column vs Fourth Column')
plt.show()
\end{lstlisting}
\note{An example of parsing a CSV file. It works but.... there are fundamentally problems with the understanding you get from actually making an implementation. Discuss briefly the code and what it does: parses a CSV and makes a plot. How would you "simply" change that? Well ifyou don't know what it does, it's hard.}
\only<2>{
\begin{itemize}
\item Saves limited amount of work
...
...
@@ -171,7 +172,6 @@ plt.show()
\end{frame}
\note{An example of parsing a CSV file. It works but.... there are fundamentally problems with the understanding you get from actually making an implementation. Discuss briefly the code and what it does: parses a CSV and makes a plot. How would you "simply" change that? Well ifyou don't know what it doews, it's hard.}
\subsection{Actually writing a paper}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
...
...
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ plt.show()
\item<6-> Conclusion: summary and highlights of results
\end{enumerate}
\note{This is the structure of a paper. And as a supplementary information we add Cover letter and answer to referees, etc. Basically the whole process of writing a paper is summarized here.}
\vskip 1truecm
\only<7->{
Cover letter, answer to referees, etc.
...
...
@@ -192,7 +193,6 @@ plt.show()
\end{frame}
\note{This is the structure of a paper. And as a supplementary information we add Cover letter and answer to referees, etc. Basically the whole process of writing a paper is summarized here.}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Actual order of writing}
...
...
@@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ plt.show()
\item<1,2> Abstract: short highlights
\item<1,2> Title
\end{enumerate}
\note{The actual order is not the one of the structure. For *Results" and "Methods" it cannot by desing write them for you. It can only help you reformulate or phrase better. But you have to provide pretty much all the information. And again it is primordial to check very carefully the output. Otherwise there may be very wrong informations that are introduced, and it is especially true for cutting edge work.}
\vskip 1truecm
Cover letter, answer to referees, etc.
\end{frame}
\note{The actual order is not the one of the structure. For *Results" and "Methods" it cannot by desing write them for you. It can only help you reformulate or phrase better. But you have to provide pretty much all the information. And again it is primordial to check very carefully the output. Otherwise there may be very wrong informations that are introduced, and it is especially true for cutting edge work.}
\subsection{Introduction / Conclusion}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
...
...
@@ -222,12 +222,12 @@ plt.show()
\item<4> Difficulty to highlight important parts of the paper
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\note{For introduction and conclusion can be useful, but again it is almost impossible to input all your work in a signle pass except for very expensive tools. It is also hhard for an AI to determine what are the most relevant parts of your work and you have to guide it is great detail.}
\only<2>{
And for the bibliography?
}
\end{frame}
\note{For introduction and conclusion can be useful, but again it is almost impossible to input all your work in a signle pass except for very expensive tools. It is also hhard for an AI to determine what are the most relevant parts of your work and you have to guide it is great detail.}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Write a bibliography on quantum fluid flows with LBM}
\note{J'ai demandé de m'afficher les points (1,1), (2,2), ... et j'ai obtenu la liste des points. Ensuite j'ai demandé un peu plus fort, alors j'ai obtenu le script qui permet de faire l'affichage. Finalement j'ai demandé une image. J'ai eu... ces oeuvres.}
\note{J'ai demandé de m'afficher les points (1,1), (2,2), ... et j'ai obtenu la liste des points. Ensuite j'ai demandé un peu plus fort, alors j'ai obtenu le script qui permet de faire l'affichage. Finalement j'ai demandé une image. J'ai eu... ces oeuvres.}
