typos

Sections/4-Tentations.tex

@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
 \subsection{A real use case}
 \begin{frame}[fragile]
     \frametitle{Let's write a paper with a bing.com}
-    \begin{block}{Major possible contributions}
+    \begin{block}{What bing can help us with (if we ask it)}
     \begin{itemize}
-        \item<1,7> Choose a general research subject (novelty, literature)
-        \item<2,7> Have a good idea (or many of them)
-        \item<3,7> Implement your idea (experiment, code, etc) and get results
+        \item<1,7> Choose a research topic
+        \item<2,7> Give ideas
+        \item<3,7> Implement ideas (experiment, code, etc)
         \item<4,7> Analyze the results and determine if there is something new here
         \item<5,7> Write the paper that presents your novel results
         \item<6,7> Submit and answer to the reviewers' comments
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
     \begin{block}{Maybe useful vs maybe useless vs completely useless}
     \begin{itemize}
         \item<2> Choose a research topic
-        \item<3> Have a good idea (or many of them)
-        \item<1> Implement your idea (experiment, code, etc) and get results
+        \item<3> Give ideas
+        \item<1> Implement ideas (experiment, code, etc)
         \item<2> Analyze the results and determine if there is something new here
         \item<1> Write the paper that presents your novel results
         \item<1> Submit and answer to the reviewers' comments
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
     \only<3>{
     \begin{block}{The problem?}
     \begin{itemize}
-        \item Three are relevant topics, but a lot of literature exists
+        \item Three are relevant topics, but nothing "new"
         \item One is completely absurd: it is the only one that looks cool
         \item Whatever one asks these AIs one will get a "positive" answer
     \end{itemize}
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@
     \frametitle{Help with novel ideas and novel methods}
     \begin{block}{Question: Can you give me an idea on how to solve quantum fluid flows?}
     \begin{itemize}
-        \item<1> "Sorry no."
+        \item<1> "Sorry no." But actually this is reasonable.
         \item<2> Only based on already performed work
         \item<3> Can only "create" something new by combining words...
-        \item<4> But gives only very generic and vague advice when pushed
+        \item<4> Gives only very generic and vague advice when "pushed"
         \item<5> Ideas \textbf{are proposed with references} but are usually not even related to the field.
         \item<6> Cannot propose actual design of complex experiments
         \item<7> Writes \textbf{simple} codes, but mostly for simple and trivial tasks.
@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@
     \begin{block}{Problems}
     \begin{itemize}
         \item<1> We tend to believe generative models because they write nice sentences
-        \item<2> But generative models are not always right
+        \item<2> But generative models are not always "right"
         \item<3> Generative models cannot give any source for the information it provides
         \item<4> Therefore we must \textbf{ALWAYS} check whether the answers are correct
-        \item<5> Prerequisite: must be experts already to be able to check correctness or live with risk of major errors
+        \item<5> Prerequisite: must be experts already to check correctness or live with risk of major errors
     \end{itemize}
     \end{block}
     \only<2>{
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
     \begin{itemize}
         \item<1> Well... Sorry but no
         \item<2> Wikipedia has thousands of reviewers
-        \item<3> References can be found for most information on the Wikipedia pages 
+        \item<3> References can be found for most information on Wikipedia pages 
     \end{itemize}
     \end{block}
     }
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
     \begin{block}{Maybe an interest?}
     \begin{itemize}
         \item<1> Codes are relatively simple
-        \item<2> There are many examples all over the internet (hence
+        \item<2> There are many examples all over the internet (hence the good results)
         \item<3> Easy to iterate quickly and see if the results make sense
     \end{itemize}
     \end{block}
@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@
         \item Inability to tinker easily (change data, presentation, etc.)
         \item "The only thing harder to debug than your own code, is somebody else's code"\footnote{Popular wisdom}
         \item Iteration is \textbf{slow}: any new version of the code takes 30 seconds to write
-        \item Iteration is \textbf{slow}: need to copy each iteration to run it
         \item Does not teach you actual coding, but only copy-paste
     \end{itemize}
     \end{block}