Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Verified Commit 716ea7d9 authored by orestis.malaspin's avatar orestis.malaspin
Browse files

added stuff

parent 74210985
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -278,16 +278,54 @@ plt.show()
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{A bit more meta-physical questions}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea?}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea (1/5)?}
\begin{itemize}
\item Plagiarism? Just cite the generative AI used as the source with date, but output is inherently non-reproducible!\\
We should also provide the exact sequence of prompts used and it would not be enough!
\item Ethics? Generative AIs are "an average" of other people's work (impossible to find the original source)\\
What if you copy-pasted an exact sentence from another author without knowing it?
\item Intellectual property? Who is the "owner" of the content produced?
\item Skills evolution? To use AI one must be expert in its field, by using AI one becomes less an expert\\
Each time you use an AI you make \textbf{zero} effort (no rephrasing, no creativity, etc)
\item Energy concerns? Each AI powered request consumes 10-20x a google search (70-140g of CO2)
\item Plagiarism? Recommended to cite the generative AI used as the source with date!\\
Not good enough because: non-reproducible.\\
Even providing the exact sequence of prompts used does not allow to get the source!
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{A bit more meta-physical questions}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea (2/5)?}
\begin{itemize}
\item Ethics? Generative AIs are "averaging" other people's work (impossible to find the source)\\
Reproduction of a sentence from another author without even knowing it without proper credit.
\item Bing: "Unlike solving the Navier–Stokes equations directly, LBM operates on a lattice, simulating fluid density through streaming and collision processes."
\item Wikipedia: "Instead of solving the Navier–Stokes equations directly, a fluid density on a lattice is simulated with streaming and collision (relaxation) processes."
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{A bit more meta-physical questions}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea (3/5)?}
\begin{itemize}
\item Intellectual property? Who is the "owner" of the content produced?\\
This question is not fully answered and will be in the coming years as legislation evolves.
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{A bit more meta-physical questions}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea (4/5)?}
\begin{itemize}
\item Skill evolution? No skills improve by using an AI\\
\textbf{Zero} effort game (no rephrasing, no creativity, etc)\\
Doing research is also the ability to explain to others clearly and developing a wide variety of skills.
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{A bit more meta-physical questions}
\begin{block}{Why it's not a good idea (5/5)?}
\begin{itemize}
\item Energy concerns? AI powered search consumes 10-20x a google search and increasing (70-140g of CO2).\\
This presentation cost about 10kg of CO2 (0.5\% of my "ideal" consumption or two days of emissions)
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment